505.842.5539     info@civicpolicy.com

The Water Authority’s Debt Question

By Walker Boyd

Ticky-Tacky by sarahgoldsmith on Flickr

In early 2009, the authoritative ratings agency Moody’s assigned an ‘Aa2’ rating to the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Authority (ABCWUA). This is good news for the Authority: the high rating ensures low interest rates on any bonds they might issue.

And they have been issued: If the ABCWUA is a house, then it is mortgaged to the hilt: the Authority has about $2000 in debt for each one of its customers.

It is strange to read about the Water Authority from the perspective of national or international bond investors. Instead of water availability, Colorado River flows above El Vado, or average customer use, Moody’s analysts were more concerned about “customer growth” and the effect that slowing construction of new residences might have on the Authority’s short-term growth.

This dovetails with another favorite past-time of financial analysts, real estate speculation. Because tax increases are so unpalatable to Americans, city governments are often hamstrung by their own success. Low taxes attract businesses (for example Intel), but higher taxes to pay for deferred costs like water use and street improvements are politically unpalatable. Speculators can thus count on friendly city managers, willing to do anything to attract business to their own city in order to attract “jobs”. But how does a city with a complete inability to raise taxes or utility rates continue to provide essential services?

Until recently, the solution has been Gross receipts: So long as Albuquerque continues to grow at a healthy pace, property sales and construction give the state a steady flow of income.

Any city manager is thus faced with a unique problem: how do you keep up with increased demands for government services (like better water treatment) without raising taxes? Until now, the solution has been to grow, and when growth has been anemic, issue bonds. Hence the concern with growth that the Moody’s analysts linked above express. Anything less than 2% growth means that Albuquerque becomes a debt basket case in record time.

There is nothing inherently wrong with bonds; the ability to efficiently distribute wealth has been a hallmark of Western society’s growth since the 16th century. Conservative historians argue that the Italian invention of double-entry book keeping and other European innovations in finance and accounting are responsible for the Western world’s higher quality of life. When growth is desirable, bonds can help a city or a country build necessary infrastructure, which they pay for later with a larger, more productive population.

But in a city like Albuquerque which has already seen its fair share of development, bond issues can take on a pernicious role, encouraging growth for its own sake rather than Albuquerque’s general well-being.


Ever since the Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority (ABCWUA) was created in 2003 by the now-disgraced state senator Manny Aragon, controversy has reigned. As Jeremy Vesbach argued in a dated (yet still relevant) Alibi piece on the Tempur-pedic mattress factory in Rio Rancho, the ABCWUA was a direct response to Albuquerque’s efforts to regulate its own growth:

While the majority of city councilors, on a 7-2 vote, won the difficult fight for an ordinance to emphasize non-sprawl, water conscious economic growth in October 2002, the state Legislature in the January 2003 session reacted by taking away the city’s water authority—and with it the ability of the city council to plan future growth.

Vesbach argues that the ABCWUA was created to sow confusion between county and city governments, to put “fringe developers back in the driver’s seat when it comes to local economic development”.

But the Water Authority has brought with it some recognizable benefits. Where before private utilities could take what they liked from groundwater supplies and set prices lower than the more responsibly-minded Albuquerque utility, changes in the law have quickly phased out these private actors and consolidated control and management of water in central New Mexico.

This is undoubtedly a good thing. For all the discussion of privatization and the need for free market solutions to government inefficiency, 3 of 4 Americans are served by public utilities; faced with the prospect of common natural resources exploited for a profit, Americans overwhelmingly prefer socialization. More recently, public drives to create public internet utilities have faced outright legislative violence from AT&T, Time Warner, Verizon, and the politicians they all too often help elect.

The main strength of bonds, securities, and other forms of packaging and selling debt is also their greatest weakness. By tying New Mexico’s future to the short-term needs of Wall Street analysts and traders, Albuquerque is pushed to sacrifice its own, self-evident long-term goals in order to continue on a proscribed model of high-growth, low-tax economic management.

What do we do if the Aa2 rating becomes a BBB rating, or even worse a CCC, Greece’s own rating?

If growth is not guaranteed, then taxes must be raised or services cut back. Americans can’t have it both ways: Countries like Greece are ample proof that unless economic growth is tempered by sound taxation, fiscal responsibility, and astute public stewardship of resources, that Aa2 bond rating can become as much a curse as it ever was a blessing.

One thought on “The Water Authority’s Debt Question

  1. I have been 2 days with no water due to water main brake at Agtrisco and Central. How do I get some accountability from the CEO as to these incompetent fools that cant fix it