So what’s the deal with national fast food chain, Chick-fil-A? Sarah Kennedy has the story.
One of ex-President Bush’s last second (or as they call it “11th Hour Decisions”) decisions was to grant Peabody Coal Company in Black Mesa, AZ a Life of Mine permit. The permit would have allowed the Peabody Coal Company to re-open the Black Mesa Coal Mine. It also would have allowed Peabody Energy to consolidate Black Mesa Mine with the Kayenta mines, which would have added up to 65,000-acres of mines.
Thankfully a Department of Interior Law Judge recently withdrew the permit. The Judge’s thought process behind his ruling from a Native Times article:
According to Judge Robert G. Holt, “OSM violated NEPA [National Environmental Protection Act] by not preparing a supplemental draft EIS [Environmental Impact Statement] when Peabody changed the proposed action. As a result, the Final EIS did not consider a reasonable range of alternatives to the new proposed action, described the wrong environmental baseline, and did not achieve the informed decision-making and meaningful public comment required by NEPA. Because of the defective Final EIS, OSM’s decision to issue a revised permit to Peabody must be vacated and remanded to OSM for further action.”
Many local advocates had appealed the life of mine permit last year, citing similar reasons that the judge based his ruling on. And now their work has come to fruition a year later.
Maybe it’s the fact that the recent instances of Henry Louis Gates and the Philadelphia kids’ swimming pool debacle have been debated hotly amongst my friends (I’m assuming many of you have done the same thing) with many opinions being offered.
Maybe I’ve just been listening to Stevie Wonder’s album “Hotter Than July” too much here lately (Rocket Love is the jam), which helped call for Martin Luther King, Jr’s birthday to be a national holiday.
Whatever it is, there’s something that’s been making me have crazy thoughts about race in America lately. It just seems like there’s a little more racial tension in the air this summer and we need to do something about it.
“Unfortunate” and “chilling?”
How about insulting and xenophobic?
Local advocates may have held back a bit last week when they condemned Republican Albuquerque mayoral candidate Richard “R.J.” Berry and the New Mexico Republican Party for blaming a brutal murder on the city’s existing immigration policies.
Albuquerque police have charged suspected members of a hardcore El Salvadoran crime gang with murdering cook Stephanie Anderson on June 20 as they robbed a crowded Denny’s Restaurant on the city’s West Side.
In the aftermath of the crime, Berry and state Republican Party executive director Ryan Cangliosi blamed the city’s police policies regarding immigrants for the murder and called Albuquerque a “sanctuary city” for illegal immigrants.
Berry and Cangliosi said they were lamenting the fact that since 2007, city policy bars police from questioning a person about his or her immigration status unless the person is already under arrest or the officer feels their immigration status may be relevant to a criminal investigation.
The city adopted the policy in connection with a 2005 civil rights lawsuit brought by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund involving three Del Norte students who were detained at their school until immigration officials could question them.
In the days since the murder, Albuquerque police revealed that they had arrested one of the suspects, Pablo Ortiz, for DUI in 2008. He served time in jail and was then voluntarily deported to El Salvador. Police don’t know how Ortiz got back into the country and came to commit the murder. But city policies on immigration don’t appear to have anything to do with it.
Late last week, a coalition of advocacy groups expressed outrage that Berry and the Republican Party would attempt to use the murder as a pawn in their political chess game.
“Campaigns like this (against immigrants) have had a chilling impact on Hispanic/Latino communities across the country, resulting in increased discrimination, hate crimes, and racial profiling,” Adrian Pedroza, executive director of the Albuquerque Partnership, a Latino-led advocacy-based coalition, told the New Mexico Independent.
“At a time when we should be coming together to mourn the tragic death of a community member, it is unfortunate that there are those who would use this issue to further a political agenda,” Barbara Dua, executive director of the statewide New Mexico Conference of Churches, told NMI. “This is a time for us to unite, not be divided by fear mongering.”
Advocates say what Berry and the Republicans are claiming is unfortunate and chilling.
But let’s also call it what else it is – a xenophobic attempt to insult people’s common sense by confusing the facts and blurring the line between immigrants and the kind of ganged-up criminals who shoot a woman in cold blood.
Using the specter of crime and public safety to elicit knee-jerk reactions during political season is an old trick.
Did any of you fall for it?
There’s been so much talk about the decline of the traditional media and concern about what kind of in-depth journalism might rise up to up to take its place.
But I’m more encouraged now about the future of journalism since I’ve seen the ambitious and righteous project called “Divided Families,” a series of stories by journalism students at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.
The series, a melange of photos and text which movingly examined the lives of families divided by the U.S. – Mexico border, won the prestigious Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award in the college print journalism category. It traces the stories of families who are separated as a result of both legal and illegal immigration and explores the social consequences of public immigration policy. (To view the full series, go to the above link and click on the PDF file on the right side of the page. )
The Divided Families project was the work of 17 students in the Cronkite School’s In-Depth Reporting class. Students took more than 30 trips to the border, deep into Mexico and to various parts of Arizona to report, record and photograph their stories.
You can read about the other winners, which included The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Charlotte Observer and National Public Radio, here.
The prizes will be awarded today in a ceremony at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
The RFK Journalism Awards program honors outstanding reporting on issues that reflect Robert F. Kennedy’s concerns, including human rights, social justice and the power of individual action in the United States and around the world. Winning pieces examine the causes, conditions and remedies of injustice and analyze relevant public policies and attitudes and private endeavors.