Melanie Aranda

Melanie Aranda brings data and financial management experience to the Center for Civic Policy and specializes in GIS mapping and merging data files with organizational databases. Her involvement in social justice issues began in 1995 as a volunteer for the Petroglyph National Monument Protection Coalition, a non-profit organization involved in the struggle for indigenous rights.

Melanie has served as Field Director for a number of successful political and issue campaigns in New Mexico. Ms. Aranda is also a small business owner, who for the last 4 years has maintained accurate financial records for a number of non-profits, small businesses and independent consultants.

A Chicana and Albuquerque native, Melanie Aranda currently lives in the South Valley with her husband James and daughter Gloria.

John Daniel

In his role as Senior Advisor, John Daniel contributes to the overall success of CCP by providing support on state-based strategy and civic engagement programs. He coordinates creative design and production of paid media, oversees the editorial functions of CCP’s online presence, and supports the issue advocacy and civic engagement efforts with policy and demographic research.

Coming to CCP in 2007, John brought his 25 years of experience as a consultant in the private sector, organizer in the nonprofit sector, and media relations and performance measurement specialist in both state and local government. He has worked with the N.M. Commissioner of Public Lands, the N.M. Secretary of State, the Mayor of Albuquerque, the Bernalillo County Commission, the President Pro Tem of the N.M. Senate, and the Speaker of the N.M. House of Representatives. He has staffed the N.M. Clean Alternative Vehicle Fuels Task Force, Albuquerque Indicators Progress Commission, the Albuquerque Government al Effectiveness and Results Task Force, and the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Unification Commission.

Michael Montoya

Michael was born and raised in Albuquerque and is proud of his family roots – from México to northern Nuevo México. He is currently the New Mexico Data & Targeting Manager for the State Voices Network housed at the CCP, where he provides technical assistance to community organizations running civic programs.

Michael previously ran political programs for the SouthWest Organizing Project. He was also a field organizer for the successful 2008 Martin Heinrich for Congress campaign. In 2011 he chaired the Redistricting Committee for the City of Albuquerque. He also worked on community outreach for several area plans in the South Valley during his time at the University of New Mexico while earning a BA in Languages.

Michael is a unapologetic geek who enjoys connecting with people though technology and social media. He also enjoys wine, local craft beer and travelling, especially when he gets to speak a language he has studied.

The Bad History Defense: Las Cruces Tea Party and the Confederate Flag (VIDEO)

By now you’ve probably heard about the embarrassing controversy swirling around the “prize-winning” Las Cruces Tea Party parade float that prominently featured the Confederate flag.

Predictably, this symbol of division, racism and white supremacy evoked considerable backlash. One can only express wonderment at the knuckleheads on the awards committee who presumably didn’t see this coming.

In making an official apology, Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima expressed outrage. He also promised that the 4th of July Planning Committee would thoroughly review the rules and procedures for next year’s parade.

El Paso Electric, the corporate sponsor of the parade, also disowned the float fiasco, and said that it would withdraw support of the event in the future unless rules are changed.

The theme of this year’s parade was the Statehood Centennial — “100 Years of New Mexico History.”

In a statement responding to the criticism, the Las Cruces Tea Party offered a historical justification, claiming that the Confederate flag was included because it is one of several flags that have flown over New Mexico during its history as a state and territory (italics added). A Tea Party spokesperson further elaborated with this non sequitur: “Because it’s history, and you can’t change history. I know they’re trying to, but you can’t.”

While it’s true that Confederate colors would have accompanied the rebel army from Texas when it attempted to wrest the Rio Grande valley of the New Mexico Territory from the Union in 1862, this incursion was a short-lived one of less than three months.

Indeed, that Confederate blip on New Mexico’s historical radar simply underscores what was glaringly obvious by their absence from the float — the flags of Spain and Mexico. General Sibley’s 1862 raid rather pales in historical comparison to the two nations that dominated New Mexico’s pre-statehood narrative for 200+ and 25 years respectively.

And curiously, with the exception of a New Mexico state flag, none of the other banners pictured on the float — notably the Revolutionary War era “Pine Tree” and “Gadsen” flags or this piece of current day Tea Party merchandising — have anything to do with pre- or post-statehood New Mexico history.

So yeah, the historical justification is as pathetic as it is laughable.

But for all of this simple-minded nonsense, that’s not the real kicker. Here’s where it gets darker. The Tea Party spokesperson, Jo Wall, added this:

“I don’t see why anyone should have an objection to it. The Confederate flag was never meant to be racial.”

After picking your jaw up off the floor, read Ta-Nehisi Coates of The Atlantic who puts that old lie to rest one more time in his post, Honoring the Fourth With the Confederate Flag.

And not to be outdone, here’s Sarah Kennedy’s take. Yes, she’s angry and definitely has an objection:

UPDATE: Almost forgot. Walt Rubel, managing editor of the Las Cruces Sun-News weighed in with this.

CORRECTION: The original post stated that none of the banners pictured on the float had anything to do with pre- or post-statehood New Mexico history. However, according to one news account a New Mexico state flag from the 1915-20 period was on the float. The post has been corrected to reflect this.